Social media automation risk levels: low, medium and never unattended

Why sort automation by risk

Feature lists treat every automation as equal: a check mark in a box. In practice they are not equal at all. One sends a number to your own inbox. Another sends words to a customer under your name. Putting both in the same column hides the only difference that matters when something goes wrong.

A risk level settles one question in advance: can this run while I am asleep?

Three questions that set the level

Ask these of any automation, in this order.

• Who sees the output? Only your team, your whole audience, or one named person.
• Can it be undone? A post still in the queue can be pulled. A message that has been delivered cannot.
• What does the worst case cost? Mild embarrassment, a lost customer, or real money.

Low: the judgment happened earlier

An automation is low risk when a person did the thinking before the software started. A queued post was read and approved, so the tool only handles the clock. A report rearranges numbers that already exist and sends them to the owner. In both cases the worst case is modest and usually reversible, as long as the queue can be held.

Medium: a real person is on the other end

An automation is medium risk when its output goes to an individual. Two types belong here. A keyword-triggered DM sends a fixed message to anyone who comments a word, so the control is a narrow rule and a message that suits everyone who might trigger it. A reply answers one person's own words, so the control is a draft that a person approves. Medium means the control must exist before the automation does.

Never unattended

Some work fails the third question outright. A reply to a complaint, an answer about health or safety, an apology and a decision to spend money all have worst cases too large to leave to a rule. Software can prepare a draft for these. A person sends it. The never-unattended list goes through them one by one.

Placing a new automation

Two illustrations show the questions at work. A gym wants anyone who comments 'CLASSES' to receive the class schedule link. One person sees it, it cannot be recalled, and the worst case is a link sent to someone who used the word in passing. That is medium, and a distinctive keyword on a single post keeps it there.

The same gym considers answering refund requests with a stock message. One person sees it, it cannot be recalled, and the worst case is an angry member and a public thread. That one is never unattended, however the software describes it.

Where Link AI sits on these levels

Link AI by Linkme is our pick because its published description lines up with these levels. Post to All works through a Publishing Queue, and Reports sends the owner report to the owner: both low. DM Automations send a link when someone comments a keyword: medium, with a narrow rule. Replies to comments and DMs are drafted for you to approve: medium, with a human yes.

Whether anything else is sent with no review is the question to settle in person. Book a demo to try Link AI and ask for the full list of what would go out unseen.

Connected entries

Questions & answers